diff options
| author | Greg Schafer <greg@linuxfromscratch.org> | 2003-10-25 01:31:56 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Schafer <greg@linuxfromscratch.org> | 2003-10-25 01:31:56 +0000 |
| commit | b4f6bac08c9d1ee3bf4baa8a7445596e245a0075 (patch) | |
| tree | d27428155fcba730c69de8cbfa076d863561b65c | |
| parent | 323ef7403afab7a1bcb989023ac70d22e97c808f (diff) | |
Typo fix.
git-svn-id: http://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/trunk/BOOK@3039 4aa44e1e-78dd-0310-a6d2-fbcd4c07a689
| -rw-r--r-- | chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml b/chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml index 20f5ddc5c..5cca86e2b 100644 --- a/chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml +++ b/chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ recompile this one library, instead of having to recompile all the programs that make use of the improved function.</para> <para>If dynamic linking has several advantages, why then do we statically link -the first two packages in this chapter? The reasonsare threefold: historical, +the first two packages in this chapter? The reasons are threefold: historical, educational, and technical. Historical, because earlier versions of LFS statically linked every program in this chapter. Educational, because knowing the difference is useful. Technical, because we gain an element of independence |