diff options
| author | Gerard Beekmans <gerard@linuxfromscratch.org> | 2003-02-03 23:45:10 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Gerard Beekmans <gerard@linuxfromscratch.org> | 2003-02-03 23:45:10 +0000 |
| commit | ef97d1698c99680a51a9d9d6f5a4c8dde515f4ed (patch) | |
| tree | f9356446ac48fcf2e13c9c7c4537ce43a775b4e0 | |
| parent | e4b9338243e80e23c08eccaaf770259edbe72c5d (diff) | |
typo
git-svn-id: http://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/trunk/BOOK@2417 4aa44e1e-78dd-0310-a6d2-fbcd4c07a689
| -rw-r--r-- | chapter05/whystatic.xml | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/chapter05/whystatic.xml b/chapter05/whystatic.xml index 9982252a0..59b221e55 100644 --- a/chapter05/whystatic.xml +++ b/chapter05/whystatic.xml @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ the name of the function, resulting in a much smaller executable. This executable has the disadvantage of being somewhat slower than a statically linked one, as the linking at run time takes a few moments.</para> -<para>Aside form this small drawback, dynamic linking has two major advantages +<para>Aside from this small drawback, dynamic linking has two major advantages over static linking. First, you need only one copy of the executable library code on your hard disk, instead of having many copies of the same code included into a whole bunch of programs -- thus saving disk space. Second, when several |