diff options
author | Manuel Canales Esparcia <manuel@linuxfromscratch.org> | 2006-01-22 13:13:52 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Manuel Canales Esparcia <manuel@linuxfromscratch.org> | 2006-01-22 13:13:52 +0000 |
commit | b28fd35a823aac2255671733df034f2327480879 (patch) | |
tree | c1d9311a3bcc86bb6fc98feedd8166a598723b5e /chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml | |
parent | 7b82580d090a238f031978610f2f3df4fd2ebe74 (diff) |
Finished chapter 05 indentation.
git-svn-id: http://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/trunk/BOOK@7292 4aa44e1e-78dd-0310-a6d2-fbcd4c07a689
Diffstat (limited to 'chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml')
-rw-r--r-- | chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml | 423 |
1 files changed, 208 insertions, 215 deletions
diff --git a/chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml b/chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml index 6524c3486..8eabbbd17 100644 --- a/chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml +++ b/chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml @@ -1,225 +1,218 @@ <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> -<!DOCTYPE sect1 PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.4//EN" "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd" [ +<!DOCTYPE sect1 PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.4//EN" + "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd" [ <!ENTITY % general-entities SYSTEM "../general.ent"> %general-entities; ]> + <sect1 id="ch-tools-toolchaintechnotes"> -<title>Toolchain Technical Notes</title> -<?dbhtml filename="toolchaintechnotes.html"?> - -<para>This section explains some of the rationale and technical -details behind the overall build method. It is not essential to -immediately understand everything in this section. Most of this -information will be clearer after performing an actual build. This -section can be referred back to at any time during the process.</para> - -<para>The overall goal of <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> is to -provide a temporary environment that can be chrooted into and from which can be -produced a clean, trouble-free build of the target LFS system in <xref -linkend="chapter-building-system"/>. Along the way, we separate the new system -from the host system as much as possible, and in doing so, build a -self-contained and self-hosted toolchain. It should be noted that the build -process has been designed to minimize the risks for new readers and provide -maximum educational value at the same time.</para> - -<important> -<para>Before continuing, be aware of the name of the working platform, -often referred to as the target triplet. Many times, the target -triplet will probably be <emphasis>i686-pc-linux-gnu</emphasis>. A -simple way to determine the name of the target triplet is to run the -<command>config.guess</command> script that comes with the source for -many packages. Unpack the Binutils sources and run the script: -<userinput>./config.guess</userinput> and note the output.</para> - -<para>Also be aware of the name of the platform's dynamic linker, -often referred to as the dynamic loader (not to be confused with the -standard linker <command>ld</command> that is part of Binutils). The -dynamic linker provided by Glibc finds and loads the shared libraries -needed by a program, prepares the program to run, and then runs it. -The name of the dynamic linker will usually be -<filename class="libraryfile">ld-linux.so.2</filename>. On platforms that are less -prevalent, the name might be <filename class="libraryfile">ld.so.1</filename>, -and newer 64 bit platforms might be named something else entirely. The name of -the platform's dynamic linker can be determined by looking in the -<filename class="directory">/lib</filename> directory on the host -system. A sure-fire way to determine the name is to inspect a random -binary from the host system by running: <userinput>readelf -l <name -of binary> | grep interpreter</userinput> and noting the output. -The authoritative reference covering all platforms is in the -<filename>shlib-versions</filename> file in the root of the Glibc -source tree.</para> -</important> - -<para>Some key technical points of how the <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> build -method works:</para> - -<itemizedlist> -<listitem><para>The process is similar in principle to -cross-compiling, whereby tools installed in the same prefix work in -cooperation, and thus utilize a little GNU -<quote>magic</quote></para></listitem> - -<listitem><para>Careful manipulation of the standard linker's library -search path ensures programs are linked only against chosen -libraries</para></listitem> - -<listitem><para>Careful manipulation of <command>gcc</command>'s -<filename>specs</filename> file tells the compiler which target dynamic -linker will be used</para></listitem> -</itemizedlist> - -<para>Binutils is installed first because the -<command>configure</command> runs of both GCC and Glibc perform -various feature tests on the assembler and linker to determine which -software features to enable or disable. This is more important than -one might first realize. An incorrectly configured GCC or Glibc can -result in a subtly broken toolchain, where the impact of such breakage -might not show up until near the end of the build of an entire -distribution. A test suite failure will usually highlight this error -before too much additional work is performed.</para> - -<para>Binutils installs its assembler and linker in two locations, -<filename class="directory">/tools/bin</filename> and <filename -class="directory">/tools/$TARGET_TRIPLET/bin</filename>. The tools in -one location are hard linked to the other. An important facet of the -linker is its library search order. Detailed information can be -obtained from <command>ld</command> by passing it the -<parameter>--verbose</parameter> flag. For example, an <userinput>ld ---verbose | grep SEARCH</userinput> will illustrate the current search -paths and their order. It shows which files are linked by -<command>ld</command> by compiling a dummy program and passing the -<parameter>--verbose</parameter> switch to the linker. For example, -<userinput>gcc dummy.c -Wl,--verbose 2>&1 | grep -succeeded</userinput> will show all the files successfully opened -during the linking.</para> - -<para>The next package installed is GCC. An example of what can be -seen during its run of <command>configure</command> is:</para> - -<screen><computeroutput>checking what assembler to use... + <?dbhtml filename="toolchaintechnotes.html"?> + + <title>Toolchain Technical Notes</title> + + <para>This section explains some of the rationale and technical details + behind the overall build method. It is not essential to immediately + understand everything in this section. Most of this information will be + clearer after performing an actual build. This section can be referred + back to at any time during the process.</para> + + <para>The overall goal of <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> is to + provide a temporary environment that can be chrooted into and from which can be + produced a clean, trouble-free build of the target LFS system in <xref + linkend="chapter-building-system"/>. Along the way, we separate the new system + from the host system as much as possible, and in doing so, build a + self-contained and self-hosted toolchain. It should be noted that the build + process has been designed to minimize the risks for new readers and provide + maximum educational value at the same time.</para> + + <important> + <para>Before continuing, be aware of the name of the working platform, + often referred to as the target triplet. Many times, the target + triplet will probably be <emphasis>i686-pc-linux-gnu</emphasis>. A + simple way to determine the name of the target triplet is to run the + <command>config.guess</command> script that comes with the source for + many packages. Unpack the Binutils sources and run the script: + <userinput>./config.guess</userinput> and note the output.</para> + + <para>Also be aware of the name of the platform's dynamic linker, often + referred to as the dynamic loader (not to be confused with the standard + linker <command>ld</command> that is part of Binutils). The dynamic linker + provided by Glibc finds and loads the shared libraries needed by a program, + prepares the program to run, and then runs it. The name of the dynamic + linker will usually be <filename class="libraryfile">ld-linux.so.2</filename>. + On platforms that are less prevalent, the name might be <filename + class="libraryfile">ld.so.1</filename>, and newer 64 bit platforms might + be named something else entirely. The name of the platform's dynamic linker + can be determined by looking in the <filename class="directory">/lib</filename> + directory on the host system. A sure-fire way to determine the name is to + inspect a random binary from the host system by running: + <userinput>readelf -l <name of binary> | grep interpreter</userinput> + and noting the output. The authoritative reference covering all platforms + is in the <filename>shlib-versions</filename> file in the root of the Glibc + source tree.</para> + </important> + + <para>Some key technical points of how the <xref + linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> build method works:</para> + + <itemizedlist> + <listitem> + <para>The process is similar in principle to cross-compiling, whereby + tools installed in the same prefix work in cooperation, and thus utilize + a little GNU <quote>magic</quote></para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Careful manipulation of the standard linker's library search path + ensures programs are linked only against chosen libraries</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Careful manipulation of <command>gcc</command>'s + <filename>specs</filename> file tells the compiler which target dynamic + linker will be used</para> + </listitem> + </itemizedlist> + + <para>Binutils is installed first because the <command>configure</command> + runs of both GCC and Glibc perform various feature tests on the assembler + and linker to determine which software features to enable or disable. This + is more important than one might first realize. An incorrectly configured + GCC or Glibc can result in a subtly broken toolchain, where the impact of + such breakage might not show up until near the end of the build of an + entire distribution. A test suite failure will usually highlight this error + before too much additional work is performed.</para> + + <para>Binutils installs its assembler and linker in two locations, + <filename class="directory">/tools/bin</filename> and <filename + class="directory">/tools/$TARGET_TRIPLET/bin</filename>. The tools in one + location are hard linked to the other. An important facet of the linker is + its library search order. Detailed information can be obtained from + <command>ld</command> by passing it the <parameter>--verbose</parameter> + flag. For example, an <userinput>ld --verbose | grep SEARCH</userinput> + will illustrate the current search paths and their order. It shows which + files are linked by <command>ld</command> by compiling a dummy program and + passing the <parameter>--verbose</parameter> switch to the linker. For example, + <userinput>gcc dummy.c -Wl,--verbose 2>&1 | grep succeeded</userinput> + will show all the files successfully opened during the linking.</para> + + <para>The next package installed is GCC. An example of what can be + seen during its run of <command>configure</command> is:</para> + +<screen><computeroutput>checking what assembler to use... /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/as checking what linker to use... /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld</computeroutput></screen> -<para>This is important for the reasons mentioned above. It also -demonstrates that GCC's configure script does not search the PATH -directories to find which tools to use. However, during the actual -operation of <command>gcc</command> itself, the same -search paths are not necessarily used. To find out which standard -linker <command>gcc</command> will use, run: <userinput>gcc --print-prog-name=ld</userinput>.</para> - -<para>Detailed information can be obtained from <command>gcc</command> -by passing it the <parameter>-v</parameter> command line option while -compiling a dummy program. For example, <userinput>gcc -v -dummy.c</userinput> will show detailed information about the -preprocessor, compilation, and assembly stages, including -<command>gcc</command>'s included search paths and their order.</para> - -<para>The next package installed is Glibc. The most important -considerations for building Glibc are the compiler, binary tools, and -kernel headers. The compiler is generally not an issue since Glibc -will always use the <command>gcc</command> found in a -<envar>PATH</envar> directory. -The binary tools and kernel headers can be a bit more complicated. -Therefore, take no risks and use the available configure switches to -enforce the correct selections. After the run of -<command>configure</command>, check the contents of the -<filename>config.make</filename> file in the <filename -class="directory">glibc-build</filename> directory for all important -details. Note the use of <parameter>CC="gcc -B/tools/bin/"</parameter> -to control which binary tools are used and the use of the -<parameter>-nostdinc</parameter> and <parameter>-isystem</parameter> -flags to control the compiler's include search path. These items -highlight an important aspect of the Glibc package—it is very -self-sufficient in terms of its build machinery and generally does not -rely on toolchain defaults.</para> - -<para>After the Glibc installation, make some adjustments to ensure -that searching and linking take place only within the <filename -class="directory">/tools</filename> prefix. Install an adjusted -<command>ld</command>, which has a hard-wired search path limited to -<filename class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>. Then amend -<command>gcc</command>'s specs file to point to the new dynamic linker -in <filename class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>. This last step -is vital to the whole process. As mentioned above, a hard-wired path -to a dynamic linker is embedded into every Executable and Link Format -(ELF)-shared executable. This can be inspected by running: -<userinput>readelf -l <name of binary> | grep -interpreter</userinput>. Amending gcc's specs file -ensures that every program compiled from here through the end of this -chapter will use the new dynamic linker in <filename -class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>.</para> - -<para>The need to use the new dynamic linker is also the reason why -the Specs patch is applied for the second pass of GCC. Failure to do -so will result in the GCC programs themselves having the name of the -dynamic linker from the host system's <filename -class="directory">/lib</filename> directory embedded into them, which -would defeat the goal of getting away from the host.</para> - -<para>During the second pass of Binutils, we are able to utilize the -<parameter>--with-lib-path</parameter> configure switch to control -<command>ld</command>'s library search path. From this point onwards, -the core toolchain is self-contained and self-hosted. The remainder of -the <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> packages all build -against the new Glibc in <filename -class="directory">/tools</filename>.</para> - -<para>Upon entering the chroot environment in <xref -linkend="chapter-building-system"/>, the first major package to be -installed is Glibc, due to its self-sufficient nature mentioned above. -Once this Glibc is installed into <filename -class="directory">/usr</filename>, perform a quick changeover of the -toolchain defaults, then proceed in building the rest of the target -LFS system.</para> - -<!-- Removed as part of the fix for bug 1061 - we no longer build pass1 - packages statically, therefore this explanation isn't required --> - -<!--<sect2> -<title>Notes on Static Linking</title> - -<para>Besides their specific task, most programs have to perform many -common and sometimes trivial operations. These include allocating -memory, searching directories, reading and writing files, string -handling, pattern matching, arithmetic, and other tasks. Instead of -obliging each program to reinvent the wheel, the GNU system provides -all these basic functions in ready-made libraries. The major library -on any Linux system is Glibc.</para> - -<para>There are two primary ways of linking the functions from a -library to a program that uses them—statically or dynamically. When -a program is linked statically, the code of the used functions is -included in the executable, resulting in a rather bulky program. When -a program is dynamically linked, it includes a reference to the -dynamic linker, the name of the library, and the name of the function, -resulting in a much smaller executable. A third option is to use the -programming interface of the dynamic linker (see <filename>dlopen(3)</filename> -for more information).</para> - -<para>Dynamic linking is the default on Linux and has three major -advantages over static linking. First, only one copy of the executable -library code is needed on the hard disk, instead of having multiple -copies of the same code included in several programs, thus saving -disk space. Second, when several programs use the same library -function at the same time, only one copy of the function's code is -required in core, thus saving memory space. Third, when a library -function gets a bug fixed or is otherwise improved, only the one -library needs to be recompiled instead of recompiling all programs -that make use of the improved function.</para> - -<para>If dynamic linking has several advantages, why then do we -statically link the first two packages in this chapter? The reasons -are threefold—historical, educational, and technical. The -historical reason is that earlier versions of LFS statically linked -every program in this chapter. Educationally, knowing the difference -between static and dynamic linking is useful. The technical benefit is -a gained element of independence from the host, meaning that those -programs can be used independently of the host system. However, it is -worth noting that an overall successful LFS build can still be -achieved when the first two packages are built dynamically.</para> - -</sect2>--> + <para>This is important for the reasons mentioned above. It also demonstrates + that GCC's configure script does not search the PATH directories to find which + tools to use. However, during the actual operation of <command>gcc</command> + itself, the same search paths are not necessarily used. To find out which + standard linker <command>gcc</command> will use, run: + <userinput>gcc -print-prog-name=ld</userinput>.</para> + + <para>Detailed information can be obtained from <command>gcc</command> by + passing it the <parameter>-v</parameter> command line option while compiling + a dummy program. For example, <userinput>gcc -v dummy.c</userinput> will show + detailed information about the preprocessor, compilation, and assembly stages, + including <command>gcc</command>'s included search paths and their order.</para> + + <para>The next package installed is Glibc. The most important considerations + for building Glibc are the compiler, binary tools, and kernel headers. The + compiler is generally not an issue since Glibc will always use the + <command>gcc</command> found in a <envar>PATH</envar> directory. The binary + tools and kernel headers can be a bit more complicated. Therefore, take no + risks and use the available configure switches to enforce the correct + selections. After the run of <command>configure</command>, check the contents + of the <filename>config.make</filename> file in the <filename + class="directory">glibc-build</filename> directory for all important details. + Note the use of <parameter>CC="gcc -B/tools/bin/"</parameter> to control which + binary tools are used and the use of the <parameter>-nostdinc</parameter> + and <parameter>-isystem</parameter> flags to control the compiler's include + search path. These items highlight an important aspect of the Glibc + package—it is very self-sufficient in terms of its build machinery and + generally does not rely on toolchain defaults.</para> + + <para>After the Glibc installation, make some adjustments to ensure that + searching and linking take place only within the <filename + class="directory">/tools</filename> prefix. Install an adjusted + <command>ld</command>, which has a hard-wired search path limited to + <filename class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>. Then amend + <command>gcc</command>'s specs file to point to the new dynamic linker in + <filename class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>. This last step is vital + to the whole process. As mentioned above, a hard-wired path to a dynamic + linker is embedded into every Executable and Link Format (ELF)-shared + executable. This can be inspected by running: + <userinput>readelf -l <name of binary> | grep interpreter</userinput>. + Amending gcc's specs file ensures that every program compiled from here + through the end of this chapter will use the new dynamic linker in + <filename class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>.</para> + + <para>The need to use the new dynamic linker is also the reason why + the Specs patch is applied for the second pass of GCC. Failure to do + so will result in the GCC programs themselves having the name of the + dynamic linker from the host system's <filename + class="directory">/lib</filename> directory embedded into them, which + would defeat the goal of getting away from the host.</para> + + <para>During the second pass of Binutils, we are able to utilize the + <parameter>--with-lib-path</parameter> configure switch to control + <command>ld</command>'s library search path. From this point onwards, + the core toolchain is self-contained and self-hosted. The remainder of + the <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> packages all build against + the new Glibc in <filename class="directory">/tools</filename>.</para> + + <para>Upon entering the chroot environment in <xref + linkend="chapter-building-system"/>, the first major package to be + installed is Glibc, due to its self-sufficient nature mentioned above. + Once this Glibc is installed into <filename + class="directory">/usr</filename>, perform a quick changeover of the + toolchain defaults, then proceed in building the rest of the target + LFS system.</para> + + <!-- Removed as part of the fix for bug 1061 - we no longer build pass1 + packages statically, therefore this explanation isn't required --> + + <!--<sect2> + <title>Notes on Static Linking</title> + + <para>Besides their specific task, most programs have to perform many + common and sometimes trivial operations. These include allocating + memory, searching directories, reading and writing files, string + handling, pattern matching, arithmetic, and other tasks. Instead of + obliging each program to reinvent the wheel, the GNU system provides + all these basic functions in ready-made libraries. The major library + on any Linux system is Glibc.</para> + + <para>There are two primary ways of linking the functions from a + library to a program that uses them—statically or dynamically. When + a program is linked statically, the code of the used functions is + included in the executable, resulting in a rather bulky program. When + a program is dynamically linked, it includes a reference to the + dynamic linker, the name of the library, and the name of the function, + resulting in a much smaller executable. A third option is to use the + programming interface of the dynamic linker (see <filename>dlopen(3)</filename> + for more information).</para> + + <para>Dynamic linking is the default on Linux and has three major + advantages over static linking. First, only one copy of the executable + library code is needed on the hard disk, instead of having multiple + copies of the same code included in several programs, thus saving + disk space. Second, when several programs use the same library + function at the same time, only one copy of the function's code is + required in core, thus saving memory space. Third, when a library + function gets a bug fixed or is otherwise improved, only the one + library needs to be recompiled instead of recompiling all programs + that make use of the improved function.</para> + + <para>If dynamic linking has several advantages, why then do we + statically link the first two packages in this chapter? The reasons + are threefold—historical, educational, and technical. The + historical reason is that earlier versions of LFS statically linked + every program in this chapter. Educationally, knowing the difference + between static and dynamic linking is useful. The technical benefit is + a gained element of independence from the host, meaning that those + programs can be used independently of the host system. However, it is + worth noting that an overall successful LFS build can still be + achieved when the first two packages are built dynamically.</para> + + </sect2>--> </sect1> - |