Current BE-LFS (but w/ GCC 3.3.3) merged -> 6.0 branch

git-svn-id: http://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/trunk/BOOK@3445 4aa44e1e-78dd-0310-a6d2-fbcd4c07a689

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 29 deletions

diff --git a/chapter05/gcc-pass2.xml b/chapter05/gcc-pass2.xml
index d89d82e82..fbf321af4 100644
--- a/chapter05/gcc-pass2.xml
+++ b/chapter05/gcc-pass2.xml
@@ -83,10 +83,9 @@ variables that override the default optimization flags.</para>
 <para>Now prepare GCC for compilation:</para>
 
 <screen><userinput>../gcc-&gcc-version;/configure --prefix=/tools \
-    --with-local-prefix=/tools \
-    --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-shared \
-    --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit \
-    --enable-languages=c,c++</userinput></screen>
+    --libexecdir=/tools/lib --with-local-prefix=/tools \
+    --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix \
+    --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-languages=c,c++</userinput></screen>
 
 <para>The meaning of the new configure options:</para>
 
@@ -141,34 +140,12 @@ a summary of the test suite results, run this:</para>
 <para>You can compare your results to those posted to the gcc-testresults
 mailing list for similar configurations to your own. For an example of how
 current GCC-&gcc-version; should look on i686-pc-linux-gnu, see
-<ulink url="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-01/msg00826.html"/>.</para>
-
-<para>Note that the results contain:</para>
-
-<screen>* 1 XPASS (unexpected pass) for g++
-* 1 FAIL (unexpected failure) for gcc
-* 24 XPASS's for libstdc++</screen>
- 
-<para>The unexpected pass for g++ is due to the use of
-<emphasis>--enable-__cxa_atexit</emphasis>. Apparently not all platforms
-supported by GCC have support for <quote>__cxa_atexit</quote> in their C
-libraries, so this test is not always expected to pass.</para>
-
-<para>The 24 unexpected passes for libstdc++ are due to the use of
-<emphasis>--enable-clocale=gnu</emphasis>. This option, which is the correct
-choice on Glibc-based systems of versions 2.2.5 and above, enables in the GNU C
-library a locale support that is superior to the otherwise selected
-<emphasis>generic</emphasis> model (which may be applicable if for instance you
-were using Newlibc, Sun-libc or whatever other libc). The libstdc++ test suite
-is apparently expecting the <emphasis>generic</emphasis> model, hence those
-tests are not always expected to pass.</para>
+<ulink url="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-04/msg00414.html"/>.</para>
 
 <para>Having a few unexpected failures often cannot be avoided. The GCC
 developers are usually aware of these, but haven't yet gotten around to fixing
-them. One particular case in point is the filebuf_members test in the C++
-standard library testsuite.  This test has been observed to fail in some
-situations, but succeeed in others.  In short, unless your results are vastly
-different from those at the above URL, it is safe to continue.</para>
+them. In short, unless your results are vastly different from those at the above
+URL, it is safe to continue.</para>
 
 <para>And finally install the package:</para>