aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/prologue/standards.xml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorXi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>2022-10-18 14:32:33 +0800
committerXi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>2022-10-18 14:41:25 +0800
commitaf6ea195fe729eb18c5362fbc2b0641d8c01ea83 (patch)
treeff41e3828a848c329f1903d4fb694b8d1699146b /prologue/standards.xml
parent294ea05cd1764b2808eb7a581427b25135ab407e (diff)
prologue/standards: rewrite LSB description
Well, somehow this paragraph has become too imprecise. 1. We don't support IA64. Both Intel and AMD uses x86_64 now, which is referred as "AMD64" because it's first proposed by AMD. Intel attempted to use IA64 (which is a VLIW architecture completely different with x86_64) to compete with AMD64, but failed. Then Intel adapted x86_64. 2. The architecture specific part belongs to Core and Desktop. 3. LFS cannot conform to both AMD64 and IA32 because we don't support multilib. It's "or", not "and".
Diffstat (limited to 'prologue/standards.xml')
-rw-r--r--prologue/standards.xml10
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/prologue/standards.xml b/prologue/standards.xml
index 6d29f8676..6ab757a07 100644
--- a/prologue/standards.xml
+++ b/prologue/standards.xml
@@ -31,11 +31,11 @@
<para><ulink url="https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/lsb.shtml">Linux
Standard Base (LSB) Version 5.0 (2015)</ulink></para>
- <para>The LSB has four separate standards: Core, Desktop,
- Runtime Languages, and Imaging. There are generic requirements,
- and also architecture specific requirements. There are also two
- trial standards: Gtk3 and Graphics. LFS attempts to conform to the
- LASB standards for the IA32 / IA64 (Intel) and AMD64 (AMD)
+ <para>The LSB has four separate specifications: Core, Desktop,
+ Runtime Languages, and Imaging. Some parts of Core and Desktop
+ specifications are architecture specific. There are also two trial
+ specifications: Gtk3 and Graphics. LFS attempts to conform to the LSB
+ specifications for the IA32 (32-bit x86) or AMD64 (x86_64)
architectures discussed in the previous section.</para>
<note><para>Many people do not agree with these requirements.