aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/chapter05/whystatic.xml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'chapter05/whystatic.xml')
-rw-r--r--chapter05/whystatic.xml21
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/chapter05/whystatic.xml b/chapter05/whystatic.xml
index 77e94e21e..1b07b0b2e 100644
--- a/chapter05/whystatic.xml
+++ b/chapter05/whystatic.xml
@@ -11,14 +11,19 @@ functions ready-made in libraries. The major library on any Linux system is
<filename>glibc</filename>. To get an idea of what it contains, have a look at
<filename>glibc/index.html</filename> somewhere on your host system.</para>
-<para>There are two ways of linking the functions from a library to a program
-that uses them: statically or dynamically. When a program is linked
-statically, the code of the used functions is included in the executable,
-resulting in a rather bulky program. When a program is dynamically linked,
-what is included is a reference to the linker, the name of the library, and
-the name of the function, resulting in a much smaller executable. This
-executable has the disadvantage of being somewhat slower than a statically
-linked one, as the linking at run time takes a few moments.</para>
+<para>There are two ways of linking the functions from a library to a program
+that uses them: statically or dynamically. When a program is linked
+statically, the code of the used functions is included in the executable,
+resulting in a rather bulky program. When a program is dynamically linked,
+what is included is a reference to the linker, the name of the library, and
+the name of the function, resulting in a much smaller executable. Under
+certain circumstances, this executable can have the disadvantage of being
+somewhat slower than a statically linked one, as the linking at run time takes
+a few moments. It should be noted, however, that under normal circumstances on
+today's hardware, a dynamically linked executable will be faster than a
+statically linked one as the library function being called by the dynamically
+linked executable has a good chance of already being loaded in your system's
+RAM.</para>
<para>Aside from this small drawback, dynamic linking has two major advantages
over static linking. First, you need only one copy of the executable library