aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/preface/whoread.xml
blob: 6dca603338df20453b74850a54ca7cf126f981c9 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
<sect1 id="pre-whoread">
<title>Who would want to read this book</title>
<?dbhtml filename="whoread.html" dir="preface"?>

<para>There are many reasons why somebody would want to read this book. The
principle reason being to install an LFS system. A question many people raise 
is "Why go through all the hassle of manually building a Linux system 
from scratch when you can just download and install an existing one?". That
is a good question.</para>

<para>One important reason for LFS's existence is helping people 
learn how a Linux system works from the inside out. Building an LFS system
helps demonstrate what makes Linux tick, and how things work together and
depend on each other. And perhaps most importantly, how to customize it to
your own tastes and needs.</para>

<para>A key benefit of LFS is that you have more control of your system
without relying on someone else's Linux implementation. With LFS, you are
in the driver's seat and dictate every aspect of your system, such as the
directory layout and boot script setup. You also dictate where, why and how
programs are installed.</para>

<para>Another benefit of LFS is the ability to create a very compact Linux
system. When installing a regular distribution, you end up with a lot of
programs you likely will never use. They're just sitting there wasting
(precious) disk space. It isn't difficult to build LFS systems of under
100 MB. Does that still sound like a lot? A few of us have been working on
creating a very small embedded LFS system. We successfully built a system
that was just enough to run the Apache web server with approximately 8MB
of disk space used. Further stripping could bring that down to 5 MB or
less. Try that with a regular distribution.</para>

<para>We could compare distributed Linux to a hamburger you buy at a
fast-food restaurant, you have no idea what you are eating. LFS on the
other hand, doesn't give you a hamburger, but the recipe to make a hamburger. 
This allows you to review it, omit unwanted ingredients, and allows you to
add your own ingredients that enhance the flavor of your burger. When you
are satisfied with the recipe, you go on to preparing it. You make it just
the way you like it: broil it, bake it, deep-fry it, barbeque it, or eat it
tar-tar (raw).</para>

<para>Another analogy that we can use is that of comparing LFS with a 
finished house. LFS will give you the skeletal plan of a house, but it's up 
to you to build it, giving you the freedom to adjust your plans as you go.</para>

<para>Another advantage of a custom built Linux system is security.
By compiling the entire system from source code, you are empowered to audit
everything and apply all the security patches you feel are needed. You don't 
have to wait for somebody else to compile binary packages that fix a security
hole. Examine the new patch and build it yourself. You have no guarantee 
that the new package was built correctly and actually fixes the problem
(adequately). You never truly know whether a security hole is fixed or
not unless you do it yourself.</para>

</sect1>