diff options
author | Manuel Canales Esparcia <manuel@linuxfromscratch.org> | 2004-12-20 17:49:20 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Manuel Canales Esparcia <manuel@linuxfromscratch.org> | 2004-12-20 17:49:20 +0000 |
commit | 242448316a5872eb33374716ac12408e9bf2f5ac (patch) | |
tree | 372da8eee42d1983ddf6447c5214b532a3f88f42 /chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml | |
parent | fba1478dba9095f0007730e844793ad38d9b5af2 (diff) |
Removed text in chapter 05 - last round.
git-svn-id: http://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/trunk/BOOK@4434 4aa44e1e-78dd-0310-a6d2-fbcd4c07a689
Diffstat (limited to 'chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml')
-rw-r--r-- | chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml | 193 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 192 deletions
diff --git a/chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml b/chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml index 666e181e2..c644ba162 100644 --- a/chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml +++ b/chapter05/toolchaintechnotes.xml @@ -7,197 +7,6 @@ <title>Toolchain technical notes</title> <?dbhtml filename="toolchaintechnotes.html"?> -<para>This section attempts to explain some of the rationale and technical -details behind the overall build method. It's not essential that you understand -everything here immediately. Most of it will make sense once you have performed -an actual build. Feel free to refer back here at any time.</para> - -<para>The overall goal of <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> is to provide a sane, -temporary environment that we can chroot into, and from which we can produce a -clean, trouble-free build of the target LFS system in -<xref linkend="chapter-building-system"/>. Along the way, we attempt to divorce ourselves -from the host system as much as possible, and in so doing build a -self-contained and self-hosted toolchain. It should be noted that the -build process has been designed to minimize the risks for -new readers and provide maximum educational value at the same time. In other -words, more advanced techniques could be used to build the system.</para> - -<important> -<para>Before continuing, you really should be aware of the name of your working -platform, often also referred to as the <emphasis>target triplet</emphasis>. For -many folks the target triplet will probably be -<emphasis>i686-pc-linux-gnu</emphasis>. A simple way to determine your target -triplet is to run the <command>config.guess</command> script that comes with -the source for many packages. Unpack the Binutils sources and run the script: -<userinput>./config.guess</userinput> and note the output.</para> - -<para>You'll also need to be aware of the name of your platform's -<emphasis>dynamic linker</emphasis>, often also referred to as the -<emphasis>dynamic loader</emphasis>, not to be confused with the standard linker -<command>ld</command> that is part of Binutils. The dynamic linker is provided -by Glibc and has the job of finding and loading the shared libraries needed by a -program, preparing the program to run and then running it. For most folks the -name of the dynamic linker will be <filename>ld-linux.so.2</filename>. On -platforms that are less prevalent, the name might be -<filename>ld.so.1</filename> and newer 64 bit platforms might even have -something completely different. You should be able to determine the name -of your platform's dynamic linker by looking in the -<filename class="directory">/lib</filename> directory on your host system. A -sure-fire way is to inspect a random binary from your host system by running: -<userinput>readelf -l <name of binary> | grep interpreter</userinput> -and noting the output. The authoritative reference covering all platforms is in -the <filename>shlib-versions</filename> file in the root of the Glibc source -tree.</para> -</important> - -<para>Some key technical points of how the <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> build -method works:</para> - -<itemizedlist> -<listitem><para>Similar in principle to cross compiling whereby tools installed -into the same prefix work in cooperation and thus utilize a little GNU -<quote>magic</quote>.</para></listitem> - -<listitem><para>Careful manipulation of the standard linker's library search -path to ensure programs are linked only against libraries we -choose.</para></listitem> - -<listitem><para>Careful manipulation of <command>gcc</command>'s -<filename>specs</filename> file to tell the compiler which target dynamic -linker will be used.</para></listitem> -</itemizedlist> - -<para>Binutils is installed first because the <command>./configure</command> runs of both GCC and Glibc perform various -feature tests on the assembler and linker -to determine which software features to enable -or disable. This is more important than one might first realize. An incorrectly -configured GCC or Glibc can result in a subtly broken toolchain where the impact -of such breakage might not show up until near the end of the build of a whole -distribution. Thankfully, a test suite failure will usually alert us before too -much time is wasted.</para> - -<para>Binutils installs its assembler and linker into two locations, -<filename class="directory">/tools/bin</filename> and -<filename class="directory">/tools/$TARGET_TRIPLET/bin</filename>. In reality, -the tools in one location are hard linked to the other. An important facet of -the linker is its library search order. Detailed information can be obtained -from <command>ld</command> by passing it the <parameter>--verbose</parameter> -flag. For example: <command>ld --verbose | grep SEARCH</command> will -show you the current search paths and their order. You can see what files are -actually linked by <command>ld</command> by compiling a dummy program and -passing the <parameter>--verbose</parameter> switch to the linker. For example: -<userinput>gcc dummy.c -Wl,--verbose 2>&1 | grep succeeded</userinput> -will show you all the files successfully opened during the linking.</para> - -<para>The next package installed is GCC and during its run of -<command>./configure</command> you'll see, for example:</para> - -<blockquote><screen><computeroutput>checking what assembler to use... /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/as -checking what linker to use... /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld</computeroutput></screen></blockquote> - -<para>This is important for the reasons mentioned above. It also demonstrates -that GCC's configure script does not search the PATH directories to find which -tools to use. However, during the actual operation of <command>gcc</command> -itself, the same search paths are not necessarily used. You can find out which -standard linker <command>gcc</command> will use by running: -<userinput>gcc -print-prog-name=ld</userinput>. -Detailed information can be obtained from <command>gcc</command> by passing -it the <parameter>-v</parameter> flag while compiling a dummy program. For -example: <userinput>gcc -v dummy.c</userinput> will show you detailed -information about the preprocessor, compilation and assembly stages, including -<command>gcc</command>'s include search paths and their order.</para> - -<para>The next package installed is Glibc. The most important considerations for -building Glibc are the compiler, binary tools and kernel headers. The compiler -is generally no problem as Glibc will always use the <command>gcc</command> -found in a PATH directory. The binary tools and kernel headers can be a little -more troublesome. Therefore we take no risks and use the available configure -switches to enforce the correct selections. After the run of -<command>./configure</command> you can check the contents of the -<filename>config.make</filename> file in the -<filename class="directory">glibc-build</filename> directory for all the -important details. You'll note some interesting items like the use of -<parameter>CC="gcc -B/tools/bin/"</parameter> to control which binary tools are -used, and also the use of the <parameter>-nostdinc</parameter> and -<parameter>-isystem</parameter> flags to control the compiler's include search -path. These items help to highlight an important aspect of the Glibc package: -it is very self-sufficient in terms of its build machinery and generally does -not rely on toolchain defaults.</para> - -<para>After the Glibc installation, we make some adjustments to ensure that -searching and linking take place only within our <filename class="directory">/tools</filename> -prefix. We install an adjusted <command>ld</command>, which has a hard-wired -search path limited to <filename class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>. Then -we amend <command>gcc</command>'s specs file to point to our new dynamic -linker in <filename class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>. This last step is -<emphasis>vital</emphasis> to the whole process. As mentioned above, a -hard-wired path to a dynamic linker is embedded into every ELF shared -executable. You can inspect this by running: -<userinput>readelf -l <name of binary> | grep interpreter</userinput>. -By amending <command>gcc</command>'s specs file, we are ensuring that every -program compiled from here through the end of this chapter will use our new -dynamic linker in <filename class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>.</para> - -<para>The need to use the new dynamic linker is also the reason why we apply the -Specs patch for the second pass of GCC. Failure to do so will result in the GCC -programs themselves having the name of the dynamic linker from the host system's -<filename class="directory">/lib</filename> directory embedded into them, which -would defeat our goal of getting away from the host.</para> - -<para>During the second pass of Binutils, we are able to utilize the -<parameter>--with-lib-path</parameter> configure switch to control -<command>ld</command>'s library search path. From this point onwards, the -core toolchain is self-contained and self-hosted. The remainder of the -<xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> packages all build against the new Glibc in -<filename class="directory">/tools</filename> and all is well.</para> - -<para>Upon entering the chroot environment in <xref linkend="chapter-building-system"/>, the -first major package we install is Glibc, due to its self-sufficient nature that -we mentioned above. Once this Glibc is installed into -<filename class="directory">/usr</filename>, we perform a quick changeover of -the toolchain defaults, then proceed for real in building the rest of the -target LFS system.</para> - -<sect2> -<title>Notes on static linking</title> - -<para>Most programs have to perform, beside their specific task, many rather -common and sometimes trivial operations. These include allocating memory, -searching directories, reading and writing files, string handling, pattern -matching, arithmetic and many other tasks. Instead of obliging each program to -reinvent the wheel, the GNU system provides all these basic functions in -ready-made libraries. The major library on any Linux system is -<emphasis>Glibc</emphasis>.</para> - -<para>There are two primary ways of linking the functions from a library to a -program that uses them: statically or dynamically. When a program is linked -statically, the code of the used functions is included in the executable, -resulting in a rather bulky program. When a program is dynamically linked, what -is included is a reference to the dynamic linker, the name of the library, and -the name of the function, resulting in a much smaller executable. (A third way -is to use the programming interface of the dynamic linker. See the -<emphasis>dlopen</emphasis> man page for more information.)</para> - -<para>Dynamic linking is the default on Linux and has three major advantages -over static linking. First, you need only one copy of the executable library -code on your hard disk, instead of having many copies of the same code included -into a whole bunch of programs -- thus saving disk space. Second, when several -programs use the same library function at the same time, only one copy of the -function's code is required in core -- thus saving memory space. Third, when a -library function gets a bug fixed or is otherwise improved, you only need to -recompile this one library, instead of having to recompile all the programs that -make use of the improved function.</para> - -<para>If dynamic linking has several advantages, why then do we statically link -the first two packages in this chapter? The reasons are threefold: historical, -educational, and technical. Historical, because earlier versions of LFS -statically linked every program in this chapter. Educational, because knowing -the difference is useful. Technical, because we gain an element of independence -from the host in doing so, meaning that those programs can be used -independently of the host system. However, it's worth noting that an overall -successful LFS build can still be achieved when the first two packages are -built dynamically.</para> - -</sect2> +<para>See testing</para> </sect1> |